An interesting conversation by two Conflux attendees, Ben Schaafsma and Adam Wolpa, who also attended Provflux this year. Their discussion compares, contrasts, and critiques the two events. A few excerpts are provided below, but it's worth it to read the entire thing.
via lamb [little art mag blog]:
B: So we went to this conference, Conflux, a few weeks ago. How did you like it compared to Provflux?
A: Well. I don't know. I guess in a way I liked Provflux more because of a more activity based perspective, or there was more involvement, I think. Everyone who came was able to get in the mix a bit more and then this one—it seemed like you could just be a fly on the wall.
B: Right, it was hard to tell who was there for the conference and who was just walking by. I think the problem was that small McCaig-Welles Gallery—using that as a home base rather than using a more multiuse facility that could house lectures and group activities.
A: Yea, and people were staying there.
B: … yeah, all in one place. I think it's funny how those conferences that are all about getting to know people and that concentrate on the exchange of ideas and things like that, tend to—Conflux was a good example of, how it didn't do that. It seems like that would be at the top of the list of priorities for putting this conference together—like creating a forum where people can get together and are kind of forced to spend time with each other.
A: Yeah—and I think that technology had something to do with that because when we first arrived at Provflux we were greeted by people. I mean, we had to find people initially—our first interactions were … these people were talking to us, but when I first arrived at Conflux, it was actually before you got there, and in that room about this size there were about six people all on their laptops, ya know. It seemed like everyone was just in this technology interface.
…
B: But the lecture series I thought was the strong point of Conflux.
A: Yeah, I thought so too. I like all those presentations. A lot of them had to do with mapping, which I think is a really strong component of psychogeography that, I don't know, I guess some of the other project did too—Trace did in a way. I really liked that aspect more than the lifesize Othello game.
…
B: I don't think I would go back to Conflux, I don't think I would waste my time. What I experienced on their website was no more than I really experienced as far as what they were offering in Brooklyn, except the lecture series. But Provflux, I'll be there next year.
→ read the entire conversation
thanks kickball jesus